Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1039548" data-attributes="member: 10086">They really paid Dillon like he was the #3 RB. I think they would’ve almost preferred to move on after a pretty tough statistical season. However at his minimal contract it was basically giving the team an open option to move on at any juncture.  Which is what they did.I dont think it helped Dillon’s cause that several other RB’s looked good in Preseason. Particularly Wilson’s upwards trend put him in conversation as a feasible #2 option in a pinch and a definitive RB3. The Packers didn’t spend an #88 overall on a RB unless they thought he was going to be part of a 1-2 punch.  Someone is going to be the odd man out and an injury is the perfect excuse to do so.  It’s a tough business but that’s why these guys get paid.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 67 (members: 0, guests: 67)

Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 11:55 PM
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Draft Talk
Always Fun To Read These Stories
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 11:03 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: gopkrs
- Yesterday at 6:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
- Latest: Voyageur
- Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum