Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1052162" data-attributes="member: 10086">Good analogy. Burrows was also a good QB early in his career. You guys are similar just a NFC version. I really like Caleb Williams he seems very scrappy. Maybe not great at anything but good at alot of things. He just balls out he doesn’t overthink it.Imagine if he played behind that Philly OL and Saquon with their Defense. I think they’d still be sitting at 10 or 11 Win team right now with Caleb.However no do overs we have to own our Losses with as much enthusiasm and find our weaknesses and turn that into a strength.GB did have a season where we lost a bunch  like all 4 point or less losses.  When you WIN the majority of games and lose all the others by 2 points or 4 points you’ve got a good argument. When you lose most of your games kinda hard to argue imo, it’s called being inconsistent. Being consistently good but losing some close ones is different from consistently bad and losing lots of close ones.Inconsistent gets you bounced in the Postseason. Whichever phase you are inconsistent gets exploited by good opponents imo.To Win you must Be consistent enough that you only have a few areas to fine tune and then just hum along. Detroit is like that. They are just humming along. Even Josh Allen couldn’t make them go away, they are like Flies on poop persistent..</blockquote>

Total: 98 (members: 1, guests: 97)