Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 1055373" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>One thing to remember, once you factor in resignings, extensions and draft class....many esitmate GB has somewhere around $25M.</p><p></p><p>Now that is of course also without veteran restructures, cuts or trades.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The discussion of having that alpha WR is one many of us have had and it is truly an interesting one. The issue often times is that with that alpha guy comes an alpha **** to be honest. GB has been crazy lucky that most of our alphas over the years were grade A humans or were not the problem children like some are (Driver, Jennings, Nelson, Adams)....I would want NO PART OF Tyreek Hill - not even answering a phone call from his agent.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The thing I think so many forget is teams year in and year out illustrate that you don't need that alpha dog WR to succeed and see success. Shoot...Kansas City does it often. This year their leading receiver is Kelce and he only produced 823 yards and 3 TDs. Jayden Reed even with all his DROPS and non production of late had 857 yards and 6 TDs. Chiefs second leading receiver was Worthy with 638 yards and 6 TDs...ours Tucker Kraft for 707 yards and 7 TDs.</p><p></p><p>Production is all that matters. Ravens another favorite to go deep in playoffs with the Chiefs, barely had a 1,000 yard receiver in Zay Flowers putting up 1059 and 4 TDs...their second leader was Bateman with 756 and 9 TDs. Their top two produced 1,815 yards and 13 TDs....our top two produced 1564 yards and 13 TDs.</p><p></p><p>The production is there. I don't want the organization to feel a conversation with a high level WR needs to happen...not when one of your most productive per game guy in Doubs missed a handful of games and still put up 600 yards and 4 TDs AND if this team just drops HALF the amount of balls everyone's numbers bump a TON.</p><p></p><p>I see a much bigger need to "force" something if we must at CB or even EDGE</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 1055373, member: 6578"] One thing to remember, once you factor in resignings, extensions and draft class....many esitmate GB has somewhere around $25M. Now that is of course also without veteran restructures, cuts or trades. The discussion of having that alpha WR is one many of us have had and it is truly an interesting one. The issue often times is that with that alpha guy comes an alpha **** to be honest. GB has been crazy lucky that most of our alphas over the years were grade A humans or were not the problem children like some are (Driver, Jennings, Nelson, Adams)....I would want NO PART OF Tyreek Hill - not even answering a phone call from his agent. The thing I think so many forget is teams year in and year out illustrate that you don't need that alpha dog WR to succeed and see success. Shoot...Kansas City does it often. This year their leading receiver is Kelce and he only produced 823 yards and 3 TDs. Jayden Reed even with all his DROPS and non production of late had 857 yards and 6 TDs. Chiefs second leading receiver was Worthy with 638 yards and 6 TDs...ours Tucker Kraft for 707 yards and 7 TDs. Production is all that matters. Ravens another favorite to go deep in playoffs with the Chiefs, barely had a 1,000 yard receiver in Zay Flowers putting up 1059 and 4 TDs...their second leader was Bateman with 756 and 9 TDs. Their top two produced 1,815 yards and 13 TDs....our top two produced 1564 yards and 13 TDs. The production is there. I don't want the organization to feel a conversation with a high level WR needs to happen...not when one of your most productive per game guy in Doubs missed a handful of games and still put up 600 yards and 4 TDs AND if this team just drops HALF the amount of balls everyone's numbers bump a TON. I see a much bigger need to "force" something if we must at CB or even EDGE [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:55 PM
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Draft Talk
Always Fun To Read These Stories
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:03 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 6:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
