Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1028937" data-attributes="member: 10086">Possibly yes. I’m ok with anything we think is a cost effective, designed role. In some ways Savage is similar in that when he’s asked to perform a more downhill “attacking” role he plays at least B grade. When asked to play a high shell type concept he’s literally afraid to tackle. I’m ok with Savage but no way does he stay for the ~$3.5Mil type $$$ I’d consider his worth $$If we think we can get an older veteran on a cheaper $2-3mil plus incentives “prove it” deal fine. Although I don’t want that to be our primary plan. We need a Stud or as close as we can get to the Charles Woodson definitive “leader” role imo. Charles was the catalyst of our SB Defense (even though he missed out with a collar bone) and we are similar in talent but without a true leader from the players side. We’ve got lots of supporting actors but lack leadership (from a trusted Player)  I sincerely believe this D is a couple of upfrades from 2023 away from a true SB contender (along with getting better usage of our D Roster)I wouldn’t sell us short trying to look for crumbs (no disrespect to Chinn) from the table. I’m thinking a move that reinvigorates all of us. Where we get excited type move.</blockquote>

Total: 93 (members: 4, guests: 89)