Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2024 Clusters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 1031040" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Here's an idea that prioritizes the OL:</p><p></p><p><strong>1.25: G. Barton, OL, Duke-- </strong>I have wondered if the Packers would take Barton, as they virtually never draft iOL in the first round. However, they may see him as having legit ability to play tackle even if that isn't where he ultimately slots in. He would give them immediate depth at tackle, competition at RG, and a succession plan at center. </p><p></p><p><strong>2.41: C. Bishop, S, Utah-- </strong>I think draft day and the closer leadup to the draft will reveal that the media had this safety class all wrong. They've mocked Nubin, Kinchens, Bullard, and Bullock at the top, but I suspect that Bishop, Hicks, and maybe Taylor-Demerson will be the most highly sought after players. Bishop is the best SS on the roster from day one. If the Packers had the choice of him or Hicks and took the latter, I'd be all for that too. </p><p></p><p><strong>2.58: M. Melton, CB, Rutgers-- </strong>The Packers could use more depth/competition outside, but they also only have one guy cut out for the slot. Ideally, they would find an inside/outside versatile corner like Melton or Phillips. Melton is a great athlete, he has adequate size (5'11" 187#), he's been under strong coaching (Schiano), he played inside and out, he has a ton of production (22 PBU, 8 INT over last 3 seasons), and he isn't quite 22 yet. He pushes Nixon in the slot and gives them depth on the outside.</p><p></p><p><strong>3.88: B. Fisher, OL, Notre Dame-- </strong>Fisher profiles as a Packer and, though overshadowed by Alt at Notre Dame, has been a very good starter for the Irish at both left and right tackle. He probably has some position flex on the interior, but I think his height makes tackle his best long-term home. The Packers need immediate depth on both sides and some competition for Walker. I was tempted to go Dominick Puni here, whom I really like, but he's already 24 years old. </p><p></p><p><strong>3.91: C. Gray, LB, North Carolina-- </strong>There are mixed reviews on Gray's ability to handle blockers in the running game, but he's a good athlete with plenty of size for this era of football who I think could become a well-rounded starter. Gutekunst recently talked about the Weak/Strong, Mike/Will designations not mattering so much anymore-- they just need two primary players who can handle multiple roles. In time, that to me is Gray. </p><p></p><p><strong>4.126: W. Shipley, RB, Clemson-- </strong>With Jacobs providing the foundation of the running game and Dillon back to add an interior rush element plus pass pro abilities, the Packers need to fill out the room with some speed/juice. Shipley brings that dynamic to the table, being a very similar tester to Aaron Jones. He's a strong pass catcher who can break the longer run. </p><p></p><p><strong>5.169: E. Ulofoshio, LB, Washington-- </strong>In a weaker LB class, it may be worthwhile to add multiples to the room. Ulofoshio is a little short and old, but overall a good athlete who had a productive career for the Huskies. He's been pretty overlooked this draft cycle and I'm not too sure why that is. I think both him and Gray would be the immediate backups on defense, while Welch and/or Wilson hold down the primary ST roles. </p><p></p><p><strong>6.202: G. Greenfield, OL, South Dakota State-- </strong>Another older, 6th year player, but who offers inside/out versatility and nearly checks all of the Packers' boxes (a little slow for them on the SS). </p><p></p><p><strong>6.219: C. Johnson, DE, Mississippi-- </strong>Athlete to develop and add competition to the back of the position group. </p><p></p><p><strong>7.245: R. Watts, S, Texas-- </strong>Crazy athlete but underperformer at cornerback. Texas had him miscast. He's almost 6'3" and he weighed in at 208#. Try him at safety and see if you stole a good player.</p><p></p><p><strong>7.255: T. Knox, HB, South Carolina-- </strong>Knox is 6'3" 240# and not a good enough athlete to try and hack it at TE, but he did a lot of lead blocking for the Gamecocks and might add a dimension as an H-back. </p><p></p><p>One thing I like about this scenario is that the first 6 selections are all 21 years old. You have to check ages in this era with the stupid covid year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 1031040, member: 12283"] Here's an idea that prioritizes the OL: [B]1.25: G. Barton, OL, Duke-- [/B]I have wondered if the Packers would take Barton, as they virtually never draft iOL in the first round. However, they may see him as having legit ability to play tackle even if that isn't where he ultimately slots in. He would give them immediate depth at tackle, competition at RG, and a succession plan at center. [B]2.41: C. Bishop, S, Utah-- [/B]I think draft day and the closer leadup to the draft will reveal that the media had this safety class all wrong. They've mocked Nubin, Kinchens, Bullard, and Bullock at the top, but I suspect that Bishop, Hicks, and maybe Taylor-Demerson will be the most highly sought after players. Bishop is the best SS on the roster from day one. If the Packers had the choice of him or Hicks and took the latter, I'd be all for that too. [B]2.58: M. Melton, CB, Rutgers-- [/B]The Packers could use more depth/competition outside, but they also only have one guy cut out for the slot. Ideally, they would find an inside/outside versatile corner like Melton or Phillips. Melton is a great athlete, he has adequate size (5'11" 187#), he's been under strong coaching (Schiano), he played inside and out, he has a ton of production (22 PBU, 8 INT over last 3 seasons), and he isn't quite 22 yet. He pushes Nixon in the slot and gives them depth on the outside. [B]3.88: B. Fisher, OL, Notre Dame-- [/B]Fisher profiles as a Packer and, though overshadowed by Alt at Notre Dame, has been a very good starter for the Irish at both left and right tackle. He probably has some position flex on the interior, but I think his height makes tackle his best long-term home. The Packers need immediate depth on both sides and some competition for Walker. I was tempted to go Dominick Puni here, whom I really like, but he's already 24 years old. [B]3.91: C. Gray, LB, North Carolina-- [/B]There are mixed reviews on Gray's ability to handle blockers in the running game, but he's a good athlete with plenty of size for this era of football who I think could become a well-rounded starter. Gutekunst recently talked about the Weak/Strong, Mike/Will designations not mattering so much anymore-- they just need two primary players who can handle multiple roles. In time, that to me is Gray. [B]4.126: W. Shipley, RB, Clemson-- [/B]With Jacobs providing the foundation of the running game and Dillon back to add an interior rush element plus pass pro abilities, the Packers need to fill out the room with some speed/juice. Shipley brings that dynamic to the table, being a very similar tester to Aaron Jones. He's a strong pass catcher who can break the longer run. [B]5.169: E. Ulofoshio, LB, Washington-- [/B]In a weaker LB class, it may be worthwhile to add multiples to the room. Ulofoshio is a little short and old, but overall a good athlete who had a productive career for the Huskies. He's been pretty overlooked this draft cycle and I'm not too sure why that is. I think both him and Gray would be the immediate backups on defense, while Welch and/or Wilson hold down the primary ST roles. [B]6.202: G. Greenfield, OL, South Dakota State-- [/B]Another older, 6th year player, but who offers inside/out versatility and nearly checks all of the Packers' boxes (a little slow for them on the SS). [B]6.219: C. Johnson, DE, Mississippi-- [/B]Athlete to develop and add competition to the back of the position group. [B]7.245: R. Watts, S, Texas-- [/B]Crazy athlete but underperformer at cornerback. Texas had him miscast. He's almost 6'3" and he weighed in at 208#. Try him at safety and see if you stole a good player. [B]7.255: T. Knox, HB, South Carolina-- [/B]Knox is 6'3" 240# and not a good enough athlete to try and hack it at TE, but he did a lot of lead blocking for the Gamecocks and might add a dimension as an H-back. One thing I like about this scenario is that the first 6 selections are all 21 years old. You have to check ages in this era with the stupid covid year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
33 minutes ago
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
M
A Packers Mock Draft
Latest: Magooch
53 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:58 PM
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2024 Clusters
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top