Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 53 Man Roster Speculation...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1001940" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Totally agree here. I think it’s generally ok to disagree with a poster. However if doing becomes a regular pattern or commonplace then the minimal expectation without permeating some degree of disdain is a proper response. A minimal level of respect for disagreeing with others should include making a rebound assertion of what should be done differently. Otherwise it comes across as having an aroma of pretense.</p><p></p><p>Btw. I would’ve loved to had Zack Kuntz, What an athlete. That’s sort of the idea of what I meant when I said take a K with our 7th rounder. Kuntz is a superior athlete that I’d take a chance on at #207 and roll the dice. I’m just a bigger gambler there, looking across the board 80%+ chance Anders is still there with #232/235. In hindsight I’d say 98% chance we’d still get Anders. </p><p></p><p>I’m not shunning Gutenkunst, just stating my own advice from above. Stating my own plan B, which I should’ve done earlier. Although ok I get it, K is pretty important once we gave Mason his walking papers, so I understand the logic there also.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1001940, member: 10086"] Totally agree here. I think it’s generally ok to disagree with a poster. However if doing becomes a regular pattern or commonplace then the minimal expectation without permeating some degree of disdain is a proper response. A minimal level of respect for disagreeing with others should include making a rebound assertion of what should be done differently. Otherwise it comes across as having an aroma of pretense. Btw. I would’ve loved to had Zack Kuntz, What an athlete. That’s sort of the idea of what I meant when I said take a K with our 7th rounder. Kuntz is a superior athlete that I’d take a chance on at #207 and roll the dice. I’m just a bigger gambler there, looking across the board 80%+ chance Anders is still there with #232/235. In hindsight I’d say 98% chance we’d still get Anders. I’m not shunning Gutenkunst, just stating my own advice from above. Stating my own plan B, which I should’ve done earlier. Although ok I get it, K is pretty important once we gave Mason his walking papers, so I understand the logic there also. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
Capitol 8805
Latest posts
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: Dantés
9 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 9:50 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
N
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: n4t
Today at 9:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Best FA in NFL History
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 7:28 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 53 Man Roster Speculation...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top