Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 982446" data-attributes="member: 13032">Thanks for the research.  I'm hard pressed to say there's anyone on that list is a "must have" or an impact player.  Permian and Schuster-Smith are possibilities to replace Watkins, but they're not superstar WRs.As some others have written, Watson and Doubs should be a potent one-two punch next year.  I'd rather the Packers drafted TE Mayer from ND, who looks to be an impact player.  I don't think Lazard has shown himself to be more than $7-8 mil/year - but I felt the same way about MVS and he's doing very well in KC as far as I can see.If they can keep Rodgers and spend in FA then it might make more sense to draft Mayer and add a solid OT in FA.  Although I admit, I thought Bakhtiari was done, but he hasn't been playing that way.  The other need is for a S, assuming they keep Amos and dump Savage.That's all to say that if Rodgers stays, this looks like a good team next year.  They need to remake their defensive coaching, starting at the top.  I still think it's a talented D, like top 10.  They need better coaching, a Safety, and continued improvement from Walker and Wyatt (although Walker has looked very good this year).  And every team can always use another good DT.</blockquote>

Total: 142 (members: 7, guests: 135)