Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 981788" data-attributes="member: 10086">Yeah. We could do that as long as the contract was reasonable.I personally like to overlap that position by a draft season to keep the shelf stocked. It keeps the WR position overlapping drafts (contracts) so we don’t run into the scenario we eventually had with Moore, MVS, EQ.While Edge or Safety or TE is another area I’d explore. The WR position $$ Has changed. That’s paramount in the fiscal sense of roster building, as we can all see what a good Rookie contract saves you in contract $ over a seasoned veteran.If we work this draft correctly? We could have a later teens overall draft selection and 3 more before #75 overall by moving around the board slightly again.  Including two more top #50 area picks. That’s also a good area to snag a WR.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 104 (members: 0, guests: 104)