Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2020 Offseason
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 865711" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>The Savage point is one I almost made, because I firmly believe it cannot be overlooked as a factor.</p><p></p><p>I still think when you have added 3 day to day starters (not discussing how well we love or like them) in Jaire, Bradley and Scott...plus contributors in MVS, Jackson and Burks to various degrees....a promising ESB coming back I'm merely asking folks to back off calling it an utter failure or disaster is all.</p><p></p><p>Honestly I grade this class in two ways at the moment: C- for overall contributions, a D vs expectations (the upper picks have been out performed by the lower...which you never hope for). </p><p></p><p>I think if just one of the group including MVS, Scott, ESB, Jackson, Burks take steps forward and earn a second contract with GB this is a solid C class on top of Jaire, Bradley and by extension Savage. If two do so, they creep with flirting in that B range. I will say this class is not becoming an A class. It contributed three quick day one starters, but two were special teamers....and I just don't see enough guys "clicking" to argue for anything higher than that B/B- range.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 865711, member: 6578"] The Savage point is one I almost made, because I firmly believe it cannot be overlooked as a factor. I still think when you have added 3 day to day starters (not discussing how well we love or like them) in Jaire, Bradley and Scott...plus contributors in MVS, Jackson and Burks to various degrees....a promising ESB coming back I'm merely asking folks to back off calling it an utter failure or disaster is all. Honestly I grade this class in two ways at the moment: C- for overall contributions, a D vs expectations (the upper picks have been out performed by the lower...which you never hope for). I think if just one of the group including MVS, Scott, ESB, Jackson, Burks take steps forward and earn a second contract with GB this is a solid C class on top of Jaire, Bradley and by extension Savage. If two do so, they creep with flirting in that B range. I will say this class is not becoming an A class. It contributed three quick day one starters, but two were special teamers....and I just don't see enough guys "clicking" to argue for anything higher than that B/B- range. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
Catamount1971
DoURant
Sanguine camper
Latest posts
D
How much time?
Latest: David Ciembronowicz
52 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: DoURant
Today at 7:57 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Always Fun To Read These Stories
Latest: weeds
Today at 7:54 AM
Brett Favre Discussion
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Stock Sale
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 12:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2020 Offseason
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top