Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 711272" data-attributes="member: 12283">I know you're going to hate this, but I just don't think that's realistic. In Campbell, Gilmore, Perry, and Lang you have one team paying for arguably the top players at DL, CB, EDGE, and OG. It doesn't seem realistic that one team, even with cap space ranking in the 8-13 range (depending on what you do with Matthews) could end up signing 4 guys, all of which are arguably in the top 15 of free agents available overall and each of which are to be the top or 2nd most coveted guy on the market. The cap money available this offseason is silly. Teams at the top (CLE, SF, TB, JAC, TEN) are going to drive up the market with the amount they can spend. I will not bat an eyelash if Campbell and Gilmore both get into the 15M/season range or above. Perry could easily approach that as well. Lang will probably be around 8-10M. Conservatively speaking, you could very well be talking about 50M in annual spending just on those four dudes. Plus other free agents and a draft class. If they managed to keep Perry and Lang while signing just one of those premier FA options, that would really be something.</blockquote>

Total: 122 (members: 1, guests: 121)

Good Bye J’aire Alexander
- Latest: gopkrs
- Yesterday at 7:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
How much time?
- Latest: PackerDNA
- Yesterday at 7:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brewers 2025!
- Latest: weeds
- Yesterday at 6:45 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
- Latest: tynimiller
- Yesterday at 6:32 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: tynimiller
- Yesterday at 6:30 PM
Draft Talk