Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
1/3 of the way through the season takeaways
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 741342" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Corey Graham plays for the Eagles and was not a starting DB for them to open the season. Why are you talking about what he did for the Bills?</p><p></p><p>Anyhow, let me get this straight...</p><p></p><p>A few of us make the pretty self-evident claim that the Packers were dealing with more injuries than most during September, as basically anyone who covers the team/league will corroborate, and we have to produce stone cold evidence to prove what should be obvious to anyone who looks up the injury reports. </p><p></p><p>You make the counter claim that the Packers were not hit harder with injuries than most teams (i.e. they were average or better in terms of how many guys they had out), and no one is allowed to question it? You don't need to back it up? You just say what you want and we swallow it? </p><p></p><p>This is ********. You don't want to acknowledge that the Packers dealt with an inordinate amount of injuries. It's that simple. I'm sorry that the circumstances don't fit your preferred narrative in this case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 741342, member: 12283"] Corey Graham plays for the Eagles and was not a starting DB for them to open the season. Why are you talking about what he did for the Bills? Anyhow, let me get this straight... A few of us make the pretty self-evident claim that the Packers were dealing with more injuries than most during September, as basically anyone who covers the team/league will corroborate, and we have to produce stone cold evidence to prove what should be obvious to anyone who looks up the injury reports. You make the counter claim that the Packers were not hit harder with injuries than most teams (i.e. they were average or better in terms of how many guys they had out), and no one is allowed to question it? You don't need to back it up? You just say what you want and we swallow it? This is ********. You don't want to acknowledge that the Packers dealt with an inordinate amount of injuries. It's that simple. I'm sorry that the circumstances don't fit your preferred narrative in this case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DABIGZ
shockerx
Latest posts
S
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: shockerx
8 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Draft Talk
Always Fun To Read These Stories
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:03 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 6:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
1/3 of the way through the season takeaways
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top