The two most significant issues on the team were not really addressed in free agency. Nobody was added to help the pass rush and, more importantly IMO, nobody was added to replace what Watson brought to the offense. When Watson was on the field the receiving corps was literally one of the five...
I'm just saying that it would be nice to have a first year impact player from the first round for the first time since Jaire was drafted seven years ago.
So happy the packers spent a first round pick last year on a guy who doesn’t seem like he’s going to be a starter in his second season. Gute needs to start hitting in the first round.
You don’t get any points on the field for cost efficiency. Not a huge signing salary wise, but i am concerned that he has most often played at Bullard’s best position.
Just curious why you don't think the Packers re-sign Walker? Above average tackle, homegrown talent....he's not a great run blocker but he's a good pass blocker and that's what's important at LT.
Pointless discussion now but I don't think Adams adds much to this team, the receiving corps REALLY needs someone with deep speed to open things up. I'm also not as attached to first round picks with Gute as, historically, he hasn't been great in the first round; in six drafts I'd say he's found...
supposedly the seachickens are now looking for a second round pick for Metcalf…i think a third would be ideal but I’d be ecstatic if Gute traded a second to make this receiving corps one of the five best in the nfl. No free agent receiver would have the same impact on this offense as getting...
I typed that quickly, poor response on my part. The Packers's receiving group with watson on the field is the most efficient AND explosive receiving group in the NFL. Without Watson, they become middle-of-the-road. Godwin is not going to be able to do what Watson could do. The Packers need to...
My dream scenario for this offseason would be to sign Mack in free agency and trade for DK Metcalf. Those two moves would shore up the two biggest weaknesses on the team IMO and both are very feasible considering the Seahawks cap issues. I don't think Metcalf would be cheap but he's not going to...
Regarding Watson; I don't think his impact can be quantified solely on the stats he puts up, when he's on the field the entire offense opens up. Get this, when Watson was on the field the Packers' receivers averaged 1.67 yards per route run and a 3.7% explosive play rate, good for FIRST IN THE...
I agree on Wyatt but the jury came to a conclusion on Walker last year...he's not a good linebacker. I have to believe that Clark's poor season was a result of the change in the defense, he's just been too good for too long for me to believe he's hit the end at only 29 years old (always...
Mack would be a terrific addition. I know a lot of fans look at corner as the biggest need but it wasn’t the corners that cost the team against the Eagles. Fixing the pass rush would be a massive improvement for this defense, rather than a better corner that would still not play well because the...
Of those mentioned in the next three, Barron is my favorite option for the Packers. The following points assume that Hafley continues to run a lot of zone: his ability to play either slot or outside at a high level is a definite plus, he has a very good feel for zone coverage and, he's very good...
People comparing Gute's performance to a consensus draft board are missing the point...the consensus draft board is NOT the standard that the GM needs to be held to. Consensus draft boards are made up of guys making a tenth of what of Gute is paid for and Gute has, over his career, been pretty...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.