Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
NFC North Draft Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 999361" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>True that. Not to diminish a good RB at in Gibbs. Yet we now know they had an opportunity to resign Jamaal Williams at likely under $4M per. I’m guessing he would’ve stayed put in that 2-3 year $3.75m per. Pair Montgomery and Williams and you’re sitting just fine at RB. Now you got a #12 to use as you please.</p><p></p><p>If you don’t have Williams then trade back into the early 20’s and picked up another 2nd rounder. Detroit would very likely have DT Mazi Smith AND if Gibbs is there later Day1 (which 60% he is) then use #34 and move up a few spots. Otherwise wait at RB until #96 overall, where you had some really good options at RB still left.</p><p> Detroit was abysmal at stopping the Run last season. When a Packer fan says that watch out! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/eek.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" data-shortname=":eek:" />To address that The Lions go out and draft Brodric Martin to solve that? At #96 overall?? I’d have been upset as a Lions fan. They select a rotational NT that could’ve easily been there in Day3</p><p> That’s just perplexing to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 999361, member: 10086"] True that. Not to diminish a good RB at in Gibbs. Yet we now know they had an opportunity to resign Jamaal Williams at likely under $4M per. I’m guessing he would’ve stayed put in that 2-3 year $3.75m per. Pair Montgomery and Williams and you’re sitting just fine at RB. Now you got a #12 to use as you please. If you don’t have Williams then trade back into the early 20’s and picked up another 2nd rounder. Detroit would very likely have DT Mazi Smith AND if Gibbs is there later Day1 (which 60% he is) then use #34 and move up a few spots. Otherwise wait at RB until #96 overall, where you had some really good options at RB still left. Detroit was abysmal at stopping the Run last season. When a Packer fan says that watch out! :eek:To address that The Lions go out and draft Brodric Martin to solve that? At #96 overall?? I’d have been upset as a Lions fan. They select a rotational NT that could’ve easily been there in Day3 That’s just perplexing to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 9:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 8:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 5:36 PM
College Sports
H
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 4:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting Jordan Love in 2024
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:39 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
NFC North Draft Review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top