Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Most "Likely" Trade Partners BOTH Ways Explained...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 954668" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>So I had been thinking about this idea a little, particularly as it relates to which teams ahead of us are perhaps viewing WR as a "primary" need and I think there are really not a ton...Realistically I only see maybe 4-ish teams ahead of us that would perhaps view WR as a top need that they would spend a first on (ahead of any other needs, of course). For me that is perhaps Atlanta, Washington, New Orleans, and maybe Philly would spend one of their firsts on one. Detroit really could stand to reinforce that position too but I don't see any way they go WR at #2 when they have other needs that would probably be a better value there. IMO Philly, Atlanta, New Orleans, and Washington all really have a lot of needs all over so some of them may take a BPA type of approach, but like I said with a lot of picks it wouldn't be surprising to see Philly spend one at WR. They need someone else to go with DeVonta. </p><p></p><p>If I had to take out my crystal ball I'd guess that probably 3 WR are taken before we're up. And it seems like that will most likely be London and Wilson as the top 2 (not necessarily in that order), but after that seems a lot more up for debate. But, all that said, at 22 I suspect we should be able to have our pick of one of Burks, Dotson, Olave, Watson, etc and won't really need to trade around to land one of those guys, if we're convinced. Of course if there is a big run or we are sold on one of the top 2 guys we could always trade up to get them I guess, but as I've said before I'd truthfully rather have a couple of shots at it. This class is definitely deep at WR, but at the same time I don't see either of Wilson/London being a top-level WR prospect like a JaMarr Chase or similar. </p><p></p><p>Then between 22 and 28 there are a few more teams that could maybe go WR (Arizona, Dallas, Buffalo, Tennessee, Tampa) depending on how the board falls. I know there's a case to be made for taking a top DL or OL if they fall to us, but at the same time I feel like it wouldn't be outside of the realm of possibility for us to pass on a WR at 22 only to have most of the top options off the board by the time we're up again at 28. And then by the time we're up again you've got KC at 29/30, Detroit again (twice), the Jets (twice), Chicago (twice), Indy, Cleveland, and all of Washington, New Orleans, KC, Philly up again before we come in at 53. All of them conceivably have some needs at WR, so unless we're looking to move up from 53...we might be looking at a lot of leftovers and scraps at that point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 954668, member: 17987"] So I had been thinking about this idea a little, particularly as it relates to which teams ahead of us are perhaps viewing WR as a "primary" need and I think there are really not a ton...Realistically I only see maybe 4-ish teams ahead of us that would perhaps view WR as a top need that they would spend a first on (ahead of any other needs, of course). For me that is perhaps Atlanta, Washington, New Orleans, and maybe Philly would spend one of their firsts on one. Detroit really could stand to reinforce that position too but I don't see any way they go WR at #2 when they have other needs that would probably be a better value there. IMO Philly, Atlanta, New Orleans, and Washington all really have a lot of needs all over so some of them may take a BPA type of approach, but like I said with a lot of picks it wouldn't be surprising to see Philly spend one at WR. They need someone else to go with DeVonta. If I had to take out my crystal ball I'd guess that probably 3 WR are taken before we're up. And it seems like that will most likely be London and Wilson as the top 2 (not necessarily in that order), but after that seems a lot more up for debate. But, all that said, at 22 I suspect we should be able to have our pick of one of Burks, Dotson, Olave, Watson, etc and won't really need to trade around to land one of those guys, if we're convinced. Of course if there is a big run or we are sold on one of the top 2 guys we could always trade up to get them I guess, but as I've said before I'd truthfully rather have a couple of shots at it. This class is definitely deep at WR, but at the same time I don't see either of Wilson/London being a top-level WR prospect like a JaMarr Chase or similar. Then between 22 and 28 there are a few more teams that could maybe go WR (Arizona, Dallas, Buffalo, Tennessee, Tampa) depending on how the board falls. I know there's a case to be made for taking a top DL or OL if they fall to us, but at the same time I feel like it wouldn't be outside of the realm of possibility for us to pass on a WR at 22 only to have most of the top options off the board by the time we're up again at 28. And then by the time we're up again you've got KC at 29/30, Detroit again (twice), the Jets (twice), Chicago (twice), Indy, Cleveland, and all of Washington, New Orleans, KC, Philly up again before we come in at 53. All of them conceivably have some needs at WR, so unless we're looking to move up from 53...we might be looking at a lot of leftovers and scraps at that point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Jontycaster
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:52 PM
College Sports
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 3:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Official Schedule For 2024
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 1:51 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 12:32 PM
All Other Sports
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Most "Likely" Trade Partners BOTH Ways Explained...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top