Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Most "Likely" Trade Partners BOTH Ways Explained...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 953858" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>while 2017 was an overall “miss” from a player trade out of Day 1, I did like the philosophy of the trade in general. We traded with Cleveland #33 for our #29 and we gained the first selection of the 4th round (#108)</p><p></p><p>IF we had 3-4 players that we deemed very equal before the opening of day 2, it’s crafty. The only thing you lose is the 5th year option, which we rarely use and is most beneficial at QB.</p><p></p><p>our #28 should get us</p><p>#33+106+#180 selections in a Jacksonville trade. That the opening pick of Day 3 and the opening pick in the 6th round. (We may have to part with a 7th rounder)</p><p></p><p>The main point I’ll point out here is</p><p>Twofold. There can only be a possibility of 4 selections before we’re on the clock. The probability of the exact players we have equally rated on our board being selected is less than 10%. We’d essentially still get our player…. But gain 2 quality selections in the meantime.</p><p></p><p>2. We could have the <strong>option</strong> of using those 2 selections to pair with our other Day 2 selections and move into a territory that has better success IF our guy is there Or</p><p>Just stand Pat and get 1-2 more dart throws at the draft board.</p><p>Our #59+#106= #51 range</p><p>a move that would all but Nail that WR, Edge etc..</p><p></p><p>Our #132+#180= #113 range</p><p>An area which should offer some good choices of “2nd tier” outside the top 5 type TE’s</p><p></p><p>#22,</p><p>#33,#51#53</p><p>#92</p><p>#113,#140</p><p>#160</p><p>2-7ths</p><p></p><p>While that may not seem like a huge change. It consolidates more selections into areas with a higher probability of success, with either zero or minuscule risk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 953858, member: 10086"] while 2017 was an overall “miss” from a player trade out of Day 1, I did like the philosophy of the trade in general. We traded with Cleveland #33 for our #29 and we gained the first selection of the 4th round (#108) IF we had 3-4 players that we deemed very equal before the opening of day 2, it’s crafty. The only thing you lose is the 5th year option, which we rarely use and is most beneficial at QB. our #28 should get us #33+106+#180 selections in a Jacksonville trade. That the opening pick of Day 3 and the opening pick in the 6th round. (We may have to part with a 7th rounder) The main point I’ll point out here is Twofold. There can only be a possibility of 4 selections before we’re on the clock. The probability of the exact players we have equally rated on our board being selected is less than 10%. We’d essentially still get our player…. But gain 2 quality selections in the meantime. 2. We could have the [B]option[/B] of using those 2 selections to pair with our other Day 2 selections and move into a territory that has better success IF our guy is there Or Just stand Pat and get 1-2 more dart throws at the draft board. Our #59+#106= #51 range a move that would all but Nail that WR, Edge etc.. Our #132+#180= #113 range An area which should offer some good choices of “2nd tier” outside the top 5 type TE’s #22, #33,#51#53 #92 #113,#140 #160 2-7ths While that may not seem like a huge change. It consolidates more selections into areas with a higher probability of success, with either zero or minuscule risk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Poppa San
50 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:52 PM
College Sports
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 3:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Official Schedule For 2024
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 1:51 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 12:32 PM
All Other Sports
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Most "Likely" Trade Partners BOTH Ways Explained...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top