Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Do we have to take a WR high in the draft?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 496177"><p>1st. round would be a shock. 2nd. round would be a surprise. 3rd. round is in the range of reasonable expectations. 4th. round on down is the more likely scenario.</p><p> </p><p>I think we'd be more likely to go high for a TE than a WR. If Finley sucks in 2013 we'll let him go. If he plays anywhere between decent and great he'll take the most $ the market will bear, and that will not likely be our offer.</p><p> </p><p>Re-signing Jones should be manageable. His chances of scoring that frequently again are about nil. I don't think there's much he can do to change the view that he'd be just an OK #2 and a very good #3. That's not a bank breaker.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 496177"] 1st. round would be a shock. 2nd. round would be a surprise. 3rd. round is in the range of reasonable expectations. 4th. round on down is the more likely scenario. I think we'd be more likely to go high for a TE than a WR. If Finley sucks in 2013 we'll let him go. If he plays anywhere between decent and great he'll take the most $ the market will bear, and that will not likely be our offer. Re-signing Jones should be manageable. His chances of scoring that frequently again are about nil. I don't think there's much he can do to change the view that he'd be just an OK #2 and a very good #3. That's not a bank breaker. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OTAs
Latest: AmishMafia
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 2:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Aaron Hill !!!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 1:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Krabs
Thursday at 9:54 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Do we have to take a WR high in the draft?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top