Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2024 Clusters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 1029145" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Here's something interesting about Sweat and RAS:</p><p></p><p>Vita Vea had an RAS of 9.52. He weighed in at 6040, 347#, had a 1.76 10 yd split, benched 41 reps and didn't jump or do agilities.</p><p></p><p>Dexter Lawrence had an RAS of 9.86. He weighed in at 6044, 342#, had a 1.75 10 yd split, benched 36 raps, and didn't jump or do agilities.</p><p></p><p>T'Vondre Sweat had an RAS of 4.07. He weighed in at 6044, 366#, had a 1.80 10 yd split, didn't bench, and jumped 26" and 8'2" respectively. </p><p></p><p>So you look at the raw RAS scores and imagine there must be a huge difference, but there really isn't. He was a little slower but also a little bigger. So that stuff is a wash for me. Vea and Lawrence got a boost from their bench reps and Sweat didn't (I could not care less-- Sweat is immovably powerful on tape and bench is meaningless). Sweat got dinged for his jumps, which the others would have too if they had opted to do them. </p><p></p><p>So the difference between the scores in reality is almost nothing. </p><p></p><p>Now if Hafley wants to build the defensive front in the image of SF, he won't want Sweat. It's all penetration and disruption over there. But if he values a 2 gapper, Sweat should still be firmly in the conversation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 1029145, member: 12283"] Here's something interesting about Sweat and RAS: Vita Vea had an RAS of 9.52. He weighed in at 6040, 347#, had a 1.76 10 yd split, benched 41 reps and didn't jump or do agilities. Dexter Lawrence had an RAS of 9.86. He weighed in at 6044, 342#, had a 1.75 10 yd split, benched 36 raps, and didn't jump or do agilities. T'Vondre Sweat had an RAS of 4.07. He weighed in at 6044, 366#, had a 1.80 10 yd split, didn't bench, and jumped 26" and 8'2" respectively. So you look at the raw RAS scores and imagine there must be a huge difference, but there really isn't. He was a little slower but also a little bigger. So that stuff is a wash for me. Vea and Lawrence got a boost from their bench reps and Sweat didn't (I could not care less-- Sweat is immovably powerful on tape and bench is meaningless). Sweat got dinged for his jumps, which the others would have too if they had opted to do them. So the difference between the scores in reality is almost nothing. Now if Hafley wants to build the defensive front in the image of SF, he won't want Sweat. It's all penetration and disruption over there. But if he values a 2 gapper, Sweat should still be firmly in the conversation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
weeds
Latest posts
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OTAs
Latest: AmishMafia
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 2:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Aaron Hill !!!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 1:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Krabs
Thursday at 9:54 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2024 Clusters
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top